MSU Video Codecs Comparisons 2021
#1 codecs comparisons in the world
|
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
compression.ru |
Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU) Graphics and Media Lab |
Dubna International
State University |
Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Russian Academy of Science |
Navigation
Updates
- 17.05.2022: Publication of Cloud comparison
- 21.04.2022: Publication of 4K & 10-bit comparison
- 11.04.2022: Publication of Ultra-fast comparison
- 11.10.2021: Publication of FullHD and Subjective comparisons postponed until November, 1 and November, 10
- 10.10.2021: Application for 4K and Ultra-fast extended
- 06.09.2021: Application for 4K and Ultra-fast extended till September, 30
- 22.05.2021: FullHD application timeline extended till June, 14
- 01.05.2021: Call for codecs published
- 20.04.2021: Call for appliance
Comparison parts
Main comparisons
FullHD comparison 2021 | Subjective comparison 2021 | 4K comparison 2021 |
50+ FullHD videos, full-reference objective quality metrics Released: October 2021 Watch 2021 results >> |
Subjective comparison conducted on Subjectify.us platform
Released: November 2021 Watch 2021 results >> |
Comparison on high-resolution video sequences
Released: April 2021 Watch 2021 results >> |
Special comparisons
FPGA/Hardware-accelerated and Ultra-fast encoders comparison 2021 |
Cloud transcoding services comparison 2021 | Super-Resolution for Video Compression Benchmark 2021 |
Released: April 2022
Watch 2021 results >> |
Released: May 2022
Watch 2021 results >> |
Comparison of Super-Resolution models paired with different codecs
Watch 2021 results >> |
Call for appliance 2021
All industry professionals will know about your codec success!If you want to participate in MSU Codecs Comparisons 2021, please visit call-for-codecs page and fill in the appliance form, or contact us via e-mail.
We are open to any suggestions for 2021 comparison: use this form for any proposals. Your contribution is very important for comparison improvement!
Thanks
Special thanks to the following contributors of our previous comparisons
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Contact
Subscribe to report updates
Materials about MSU Codec Comparison
See all MSU Video Codecs Comparisons
MSU video codecs comparisons resources:
- Introduction to Video Codecs Comparison
- Lossless Video Codecs Comparison 2004 (October 2004)
- MPEG-4 SP/ASP Video Codecs Comparison (March 2005)
- JPEG 2000 Image Codecs Comparison (September 2005)
- First Annual MPEG-4 AVC/ H.264 Video Codecs Comparison (January 2005)
- Second Annual MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Video Codec Comparison (December 2005)
- Subjective Comparison of Modern Video Codecs (February 2006)
- MPEG-2 Video Decoders Comparison (May 2006)
- WMP and JPEG2000 Comparison (October 2006)
- Third Annual MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (December 2006) (All versions for free!)
- Lossless Video Codecs Comparison 2007 (March 2007)
- Fourth Annual MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (December 2007) (All versions for free!)
- Options Analysis of MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Codec x264 (December 2008)
- Fifth MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (May 2009) (All versions for free!)
- Sixth MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (May 2010)
- Seventh MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (May 2011)
- Eighth MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (May 2012)
- Ninth MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (Dec 2013)
- Tenth Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Oct 2015)
- Eleventh Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Aug 2016)
- Twelfth Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Aug 2017)
- Thirteen Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Aug 2018)
- Fourteen Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Sept 2019)
- Cloud Encoding Servoces Comparison 2019 (Dec 2019)
- Fifteen Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Dec 2020)
- Sixteen Video Codec Comparison (Dec 2021)
- Seventeen Video Codecs Comparisons (Nov 2022)
- Eighteen Video Codecs Comparisons
- Codec Analysis for Companies:
Other Materials
Video resources:
Server size: 8069 files, 1215Mb (Server statistics)
Project updated by
Server Team and
MSU Video Group
Project sponsored by YUVsoft Corp.
Project supported by MSU Graphics & Media Lab