Video Area Home >> Video-Codec Comparisons >> HEVC/AV1 Video Codecs Comparison 2019

MSU Video Codecs Comparison 2020

Fifteen Annual Worldwide Video Codecs Comparison

Deepest codecs review: 5 reports, including subjective with 1000+ viewers and 7000+ charts

Video group head: Dr. Dmitriy Vatolin
Project head: Dr. Dmitriy Kulikov
Measurements, analysis: Dr. Mikhail Erofeev,
Anastasia Antsiferova,
Egor Sklyarov

Navigation


Call For Codecs

Take part in 2020 MSU Video Codecs Comparison!

We perform comparative unbiased analysis for

  • software
  • hardware (GPU-based)
  • cloud-based (cloud transcoding)
implementations of different video coding standards (H.265/HEVC, H.264/MPEG-4 AVC, AV1, VP9, VP8, MPEG-4 and other) using objective metrics (SSIM, VMAF, PSNR and other) and massive subjective tests.

With MSU Video Codecs Comparison developers can verify the performance of their codec
We share test sequences, encoding parameters and encoder versions so all developers can reproduce the results of the comparison. Participation with publishing of all results is free. The comparison is done using encoding settings provided by the developers of each participating codec.




Comparison parts

FullHD comparison 2020 Subjective comparison 2020 4K(UHD) objective comparison
Two encoding use cases measured on 50 FullHD videos

Approximate release date: August-September 2020

See 2019 Main report results >>
Subjective comparison conducted on Subjectify.us platform

Approximate release date: September-October 2020

See 2019 Subjective report results >>
Comparison on high-resolution video sequences

Approximate release date: November-December 2020

See 2018 4K report results >>

Comparison Methodology

Comparison methodology main points:
  • 100 FullHD video sequences (main report) + 10 4K video sequences (separate 4K comparison report).
  • SSIM, PSNR, VMAF objective metrics and subjective evaluation
  • 3 color-planes (Y,U,V) and integral metric values
  • 2 use-cases for comparison on FullHD videos: Fast and Offline encoding (differ by encoding speed) + 2 use-cases for subjective comparison on FullHD videos + 2 special use-cases for comparison on 4K videos
  • 8-10 different target bitrates (1-12 Mbps for HD and 2-20 Mbps for 4K)
  • Prosumer-level modern hardware
  • Fully automatic testing system
  • 15000+ resulting graphs, PDF and HTML reports

Full comparison methodology (PDF, 1.1 MB)


Thanks

Special thanks to the following contributors of our previous comparisons

Google Intel AMD NVidia
ATI Adobe ISPhone dicas
KDDI R&D labs Dolby Tata Elxsi Octasic
Qualcomm Voceweb Elgato Telecast
Huawei MainConcept Vitec Tencent

Give us your opinion about comparison


Contact


compression.ru
in cooperation
with
Lomonosov MSU
Graphics & Media Lab
(Video Group)
Dubna State University
Institute for Information
Transmission Problems RAS

Subscribe to report updates


Materials about MSU Codec Comparison


Call for cloud encoding comparison participation 2020
See all MSU Video Codecs Comparisons

MSU video codecs comparisons resources:


Other Materials


Video resources:

Last updated: 02-July-2020


Server size: 8069 files, 1215Mb (Server statistics)

Project updated by
Server Team and MSU Video Group

Project sponsored by YUVsoft Corp.

Project supported by MSU Graphics & Media Lab