First Annual MSU MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Video Codec ComparisonFor professional users and codec authorsMSU Graphics & Media Lab (Video Group)Return to first H.264/AVC comparison home page! Part 1. IntroductionContentsThanksWe would like to thank Moonlight Cordless LTD, Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits IIS and Ateme for kindly providing us their codecs for this test.
OverviewCodecs
Video sequences
Goal and testing rulesGoal of H.264 codecs comparisonThe main goal of this work was the comparative assessment of codecs quality in terms of consumer video compression. The video sequences used to perform this assessment were processed with a simple prevalent deinterlacing filter. The codecs were used with their default options. Testing rules
SequencesBankomatdi
This sequence is a fragment of the "Terminator-2" movie, which represents the scene near the cash dispenser. The sequence is characterized by slow motion, very little change of background (in the second part of the sequence camera slowly goes to the right) and comparatively high resolution. Battle
This sequence is also a fragment of the "Terminator-2" movie, which represents the very beginning of the film. In the terms of compression this sequence is the most difficult one among all other sequences that took part in the testing. It is caused by three main reasons: constant changing of brightness because of the explosions and laser flashes, very quick motion and frequent changes of the scene that make codecs often compress frames as I-frames. Bbc3di
This sequence is characterized by pronounced rotary motion. It contains a rotating striped drum with different pictures and photos on it. Quality of the compressed sequence can be estimated by the details on these images. Foreman
This is another standard sequence. It represents a face with very rich mimic. On the one hand motion here is not very intensive, but on the other it is disordered, not forward. Intricate character of motion creates problems for the motion compensation process. In addition camera is shaking which makes the image unsteady. In the end of the sequence camera suddenly turns to the building site and there follows an almost motionless scene. So this sequence also shows codec's behavior on a static scene after intensive motion. Susidi
This sequence is characterized by high-level noise and slow motion. In its first part the scene is almost static (the girl only blinks), then there is some motion (she abruptly moves her head) and then the scene becomes almost static again. Noise is suppressed on every second frame due to the B-frames option in MPEG-2 codec. CodecsMpegable AVC Codec
Remarks: VirtualDub jobs support contains an error on different bit rates. When trying to create several jobs only the last one is performed. Possible source is that codec might not save its settings during job creation. Moonlight H.264 Video Codec
Remarks: Codec was tested without problems. MainConcept H.264 Codec
Remarks:
Fraunhofer IIS Codec
Remarks:
Ateme MPEG-4 AVC / H.264 Codec
Remarks: Codec was tested without problems. Videosoft H.264 Codec
Remarks: Codec was tested without problems. DivX Pro™ 5.1.1 Codec
Remarks: Codec was tested without problems. |
Contents
Download
- MSU H.264/MPEG-4 AVC Codecs Comparison - PDF (3248 Kb)
- MSU H.264/MPEG-4 AVC Codecs Comparison - ZIP (2709 Kb)
Contact Information
Additional information
See all MSU Video Codecs Comparisons
MSU video codecs comparisons resources:
- Introduction to Video Codecs Comparison
- Lossless Video Codecs Comparison 2004 (October 2004)
- MPEG-4 SP/ASP Video Codecs Comparison (March 2005)
- JPEG 2000 Image Codecs Comparison (September 2005)
- First Annual MPEG-4 AVC/ H.264 Video Codecs Comparison (January 2005)
- Second Annual MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Video Codec Comparison (December 2005)
- Subjective Comparison of Modern Video Codecs (February 2006)
- MPEG-2 Video Decoders Comparison (May 2006)
- WMP and JPEG2000 Comparison (October 2006)
- Third Annual MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (December 2006) (All versions for free!)
- Lossless Video Codecs Comparison 2007 (March 2007)
- Fourth Annual MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (December 2007) (All versions for free!)
- Options Analysis of MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Codec x264 (December 2008)
- Fifth MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (May 2009) (All versions for free!)
- Sixth MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (May 2010)
- Seventh MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (May 2011)
- Eighth MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (May 2012)
- Ninth MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (Dec 2013)
- Tenth Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Oct 2015)
- Eleventh Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Aug 2016)
- Twelfth Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Aug 2017)
- Thirteen Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Aug 2018)
- Fourteen Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Sept 2019)
- Cloud Encoding Servoces Comparison 2019 (Dec 2019)
- Fifteen Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Dec 2020)
- Sixteen Video Codec Comparison (Dec 2021)
- Seventeen Video Codecs Comparisons (Nov 2022)
- Eighteen Video Codecs Comparisons
- Codec Analysis for Companies:
Other materials
Video resources:
Server size: 8069 files, 1215Mb (Server statistics)
Project updated by
Server Team and
MSU Video Group
Project sponsored by YUVsoft Corp.
Project supported by MSU Graphics & Media Lab